Barnes Reservoir Case Study

Description & Background

The Baldwin Hills Reservoir was constructed in 1951 to provide water to the south and southwest portions of the city of Los Angeles, California. Sitting atop one of the tallest hills in the region, the reservoir was confined on three sides by compacted earth dikes and the Baldwin Hills Dam on the northern fourth side. The Baldwin Hills Dam reached a height of 232 feet and stretched a total of 650 feet in length. At 3:38 P.M. on December 14, 1963, the Baldwin Hills Dam breached releasing a majority of the reservoir’s 250 million gallons of stored water. The sudden release resulted in the death of five people and approximately $11 million in property damage.

Engineers involved with the design of the Baldwin Hills Reservoir and Dam recognized the difficulties associated with the land on which they planned to build the structure. At the location of the dam and reservoir, the immediate subsurface is comprised of loose, sandy soil followed by large block-like rock formations. In an effort to prevent water inside the reservoir from contacting the soft, erodible soil beneath it, the reservoir was equipped with a complex underdrain system. A typical section of the drainage system between the water in the reservoir and the dam embankment is shown in the figure on this page.

In addition to understanding the foundation’s geology, the reservoir’s designers acknowledged the Inglewood Fault system that underlays the Baldwin Hills area. They assumed, however, that any movement or subsidence that occurred at the site of the dam as a result of the fault system would not be large enough to compromise the integrity of the brittle liner.

Typical section of Baldwin Hills Reservoir lining.

Around 11:15 A.M. on December 14, 1963, during a routine daily inspection, the reservoir’s caretaker noticed that water had begun draining from the pipes beneath the asphalt membrane liner. Concerned by the unusual circumstance, the caretaker and the operating engineer engaged the outlet works designed to lower the reservoir in emergency situations. Because the reservoir would take approximately 24 hours to drain safely and completely, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) asked that police execute an evacuation downstream. Within four hours of the initial signs of danger, approximately 1,600 downstream residents had been evacuated from their homes.

In the meantime, LADWP personnel worked furiously to clear debris from the emergency discharge pipes and stop the interior face of the dam from eroding. Despite their efforts, a section of the Baldwin Hills Dam collapsed at 3:38 P.M. unleashing a wave of destruction on the town below.

Less than an hour and a half later, water had stopped flowing from the opening in the dam leaving the Baldwin Hills Reservoir nearly empty. Only after the reservoir was drained was it revealed that the asphalt liner between the embankment and reservoir’s contents had cracked allowing water to penetrate and erode the soil beneath it. There was much speculation of the primary cause(s) of the crack during the investigation of the Baldwin Hills Dam failure. The crack could have been caused by the movement of the schist below the dam, a combination of that natural phenomenon and the injection of pressurized liquid into the oil field near the dam, or the heavy equipment used during construction.

Though the Baldwin Hills Reservoir and Dam failed, the emergency action implemented by the caretaker, operating engineer, LADWP, and evacuation personnel was a great success. Routine maintenance of the dam led to the early discovery of the deficiency. While the failure of the dam resulted in the death of five individuals, the early detection and subsequent evacuation lowered the resulting death toll from potentially as high as 1,500.


(1) Barnes, M. (1992).  Famous Failures:  Revisiting Major Dam Catastrophes.  ASDSO Annual Conference.  Baltimore: Association of State Dam Safety Officials. 

(2) Hamilton, D. & Meehan, R. (1971, 172).  Ground Rupture in the Baldwin Hills.  SCIENCE, 333-344.

(3) Jansen, R. (1988).  Advanced Dam Engineering for Design, Construction, and Rehabilitation.  New York:  Wiley, 8-16.

(4) VandenBerge, D., Duncan, J., & Brandon, T. (2011).  Lessons Learned From Dam Failures.  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Case study: management of water usage in MEDCs

Elan Valley Water Transfer Scheme

Much of Birmingham's tap water comes from over 100 km away. There are five dams in the Elan Valley which can supply Birmingham with 160 million litres of water a day.

The Craig Goch Dam, Elan Valley.

Reasons for choosing the Elan valley location

  • Deep narrow valleys to hold the water in.
  • Impermeable rock means the water wouldn't leak away.
  • A high annual rainfall of 1830 mm.
  • The area is higher than Birmingham, so the water can flow using gravity rather than pumps.

Pen-Y-Garreg reservoir, Elan Valley

Future expansion of the scheme raises problems. The local environment would be damaged. There would be increased traffic and noise from the construction of dams to provide extra capacity. The river flow downstream would be affected, along with the wildlife. Also more land would be affected when pipes are run across it.

Back to Water and rivers index

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Barnes Reservoir Case Study”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *